ford: be cheaper than chevys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, car
Weight: 0.59
, corporation
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.55
Siblings volvo
Weight: 0.61
, mustang
Weight: 0.54
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.34
, porsche
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than chevys 1.00
is more expensive 0.89
be better than holdens 0.84
be better than chevys 0.84
be more expensive than chevy 0.78
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ford, is more expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ford, be better than holdens)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ford, be better than holdens)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ford, be better than chevys)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ford, is more expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ford, be better than chevys)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ford, be better than holdens)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ford, is more expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ford, is more expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ford, be better than chevys)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ford, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ford, be better than chevys)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ford, be better than holdens)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ford, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ford, be more expensive than chevy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ford, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ford, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ford, be cheaper than chevys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys)