ford: be better than holdens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, car
Weight: 0.59
, corporation
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.55
Siblings volvo
Weight: 0.61
, mustang
Weight: 0.54
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.34
, porsche
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than holdens 1.00
be better than chevys 1.00
has quality better 0.86
be cheaper than chevys 0.84
is more expensive 0.78
be better than chevy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ford, be better than holdens)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ford, be better than chevys)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ford, be better than chevys)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ford, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ford, be better than chevys)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ford, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ford, is more expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ford, be better than chevys)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ford, be better than chevy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ford, is more expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ford, be better than chevy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ford, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ford, be better than chevy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ford, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ford, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ford, be better than chevy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ford, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ford, be better than holdens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ford, be better than holdens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ford, be better than holdens)