forest: be important for animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.61
, scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grove
Weight: 0.48
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, grassland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for animals 1.00
be useful to animals 0.91
be important to animal life 0.89
be important to humans 0.83
be important for human being 0.81
be useful to humans 0.79
be important for human beings 0.78
be useful for human life 0.78
be useful for human beings 0.77
be important for beings 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be important for animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be useful to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(forest, be important for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(grassland, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important to humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wetland, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wetland, be useful to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(forest, be important for animals)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(forest, be useful to animals)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(forest, be useful to animals)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(forest, be useful to animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(forest, be useful to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(forest, be useful to humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(forest, be useful to humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful for human beings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be important for animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(forest, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)