form: were different in asia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings circle
Weight: 0.63
, metaphor
Weight: 0.63
, register
Weight: 0.63
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.63
, bowl
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
were different in asia 1.00
is silk road impacted in centrel asia 0.82
japanese in world war 2 0.77
were used in germany 0.76
were used in early germany 0.75
were used in modern germany 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(way, is silk road impacted in centrel asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(form, were different in asia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(method, were used in early germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(form, were different in asia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(form, were different in asia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(form, were different in asia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(way, is silk road impacted in centrel asia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(method, were used in germany)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, were used in modern germany)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(method, were used in early germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(way, is silk road impacted in centrel asia)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in early germany)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in modern germany)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(way, is silk road impacted in centrel asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(form, were different in asia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(form, were different in asia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(method, were used in early germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(form, were different in asia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(form, were different in asia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(form, were different in asia)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(form, japanese in world war 2)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(form, japanese in world war 2)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(form, japanese in world war 2)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(form, japanese in world war 2)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(form, were different in asia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(form, were different in asia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(way, is silk road impacted in centrel asia)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(method, were used in modern germany)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(method, were used in early germany)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(way, is silk road impacted in centrel asia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(method, were used in modern germany)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(form, were different in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(method, were used in early germany)