fox: become endangered

Related concepts

Parents	mammal Weight: 0.74 , wild animal Weight: 0.71 , predator Weight: 0.68 , species Weight: 0.66 , man Weight: 0.65
Siblings	red fox Weight: 0.75 , arctic fox Weight: 0.39 , coyote Weight: 0.39 , kangaroo rat Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
become endangered	1.00
is endangered	0.94
become extinct	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(species, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(fox, become endangered)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(fox, become endangered)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(species, become extinct) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(fox, become endangered)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(species, become extinct) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(fox, become endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(species, become endangered)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(species, become extinct)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(species, become extinct)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(species, become extinct)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(species, become extinct)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(species, become endangered)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, is endangered)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, become endangered)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, become extinct)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(coyote, is endangered)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, is endangered)

...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(species, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(fox, become endangered)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(fox, become endangered)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(species, become extinct) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(fox, become endangered)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(species, become extinct) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(fox, become endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(arctic fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(arctic fox, become endangered)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(red fox, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(red fox, is endangered)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(arctic fox, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(arctic fox, is endangered)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(coyote, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(coyote, is endangered)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(kangaroo rat, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, is endangered)

...

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(fox, become endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(fox, is endangered)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(fox, is endangered)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(fox, is endangered)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(fox, become extinct)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(fox, become extinct)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(fox, become endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(species, is endangered)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(species, become endangered)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(species, become extinct)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(species, become extinct)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(arctic fox, become extinct)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(arctic fox, is endangered)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(red fox, is endangered)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(arctic fox, become endangered)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(coyote, is endangered)

...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(species, become endangered)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(species, is endangered)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(species, become extinct)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(fox, become endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(species, become extinct)