red fox: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00
is species 0.79
is invasive species 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(red fox, is endangered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(arctic fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(red fox, is endangered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(red fox, is endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fox, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fox, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gray fox, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, is species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(arctic fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(red fox, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(red squirrel, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, is endangered)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(red panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(red panda, is endangered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(gray fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(gray fox, is endangered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(brown bear, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(brown bear, is endangered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(brown bear, is species)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(brown bear, is species)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(red fox, is endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(red fox, is species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(red fox, is species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red fox, is species)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is species)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(red fox, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brown bear, is species)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(red squirrel, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gray fox, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(brown bear, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, is endangered)