:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fox, is animals)
Similarity expansion
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, is animal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fox, is animal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fox, is dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fox, is animal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fox, is animal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fox, is dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fox, is dogs)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fox, is animals)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings