fox: is animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is animals 1.00
is animal 0.90
is endangered animals 0.89
be called animal 0.87
be pets 0.86
be like cats 0.86
protect from animals 0.86
is dogs 0.86
be as pets 0.85
be more special than animals 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(red fox, protect from animals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, is animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, is animals)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, is animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(red fox, protect from animals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(red fox, protect from animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fox, is animals)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, is animal)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, be called animal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fox, is animal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fox, be called animal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fox, is dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fox, is animal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fox, is animal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fox, be called animal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fox, is dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fox, be called animal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fox, is dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, is animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fox, is animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, is animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, is animals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, protect from animals)