:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(coyote, attack dogs)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fox, is dogs)
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, get called cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fox, attack dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, be like dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fox, attack dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fox, relate to dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fox, get called cats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fox, attack dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, attack dogs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fox, relate to dogs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fox, relate to dogs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fox, be like dogs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fox, be like dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, relate to dogs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, be like dogs)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
Typical implies Plausible
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fox, is dogs)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(coyote, attack dogs)