fox: be called animal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called animal 1.00
is animal 0.97
is animals 0.87
get called cats 0.83
be like cats 0.81
act like cats 0.81
is endangered animals 0.81
be like dogs 0.80
is dogs 0.79
look like cats 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, is animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, is animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fox, be called animal)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, is animal)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fox, is animal)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, is animals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, get called cats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fox, is animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, be like dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(fox, get called cats)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fox, look like cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fox, is animal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fox, is animal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(fox, look like cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, look like cats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fox, is dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fox, is animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fox, get called cats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fox, is animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fox, is dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fox, be like dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fox, is dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fox, look like cats)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fox, get called cats)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fox, be like dogs)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, be like dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, be called animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fox, be called animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fox, be called animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, is animals)