french fry: be bad for health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for health 1.00
has quality bad 0.81
be good for children 0.78
be good for diabetes 0.78
has quality good 0.77
be good for human body 0.76
be good for babies 0.76
be bad for diabetics 0.75
be healthy for us 0.75
be good for asthma 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(french fry, be bad for health)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(french fry, be bad for health)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vegetable, be good for human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(french fry, be bad for health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be good for human body)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(potato, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be good for human body)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(potato, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(okra, be good for diabetes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, be good for asthma)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(french fry, be bad for health)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(french fry, be bad for health)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vegetable, be good for human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(french fry, be bad for health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(okra, be good for diabetes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(okra, be good for diabetes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cauliflower, be good for asthma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, be good for asthma)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for babies)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(french fry, be bad for health)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(french fry, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(french fry, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(french fry, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(french fry, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(french fry, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(french fry, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(french fry, be bad for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable, be good for human body)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(okra, be good for diabetes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cauliflower, be good for asthma)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for babies)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable, be good for human body)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(french fry, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)