functionalism: is consensus theory

Related concepts

Parents	term Weight: 0.50 , topic Weight: 0.50 , view Weight: 0.49 , theory Weight: 0.46 , approach Weight: 0.44
Siblings	constructivism Weight: 0.33 , theology Weight: 0.31 , formalism Weight: 0.31 , naturalism Weight: 0.31 , political ideology Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is consensus theory	1.00
is theory	0.80
be considered theory	0.79
is best theory	0.79
be stronger than hypothesis	0.77
be different from hypothesis	0.76
be more important than theories	0.76
is hypothesis	0.76
is structural theory	0.76
have greater certainty than hypotheses	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(theory, be more important than theories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(theory, is hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(theory, is hypothesis)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than theories)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(theory, be different from hypothesis)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(theory, is hypothesis)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(theory, be more important than theories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(theory, is hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(functionalism, is consensus theory)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(functionalism, is theory)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is theory)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is best theory)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(functionalism, is structural theory)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is theory)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is structural theory)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is structural theory)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(functionalism, is theory)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is best theory)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(functionalism, is structural theory)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(functionalism, is best theory)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, is best theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(theory, is hypothesis)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(theory, is hypothesis)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(functionalism, is consensus theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)