functionalism: be considered theory

Related concepts

Parents	term Weight: 0.50 , topic Weight: 0.50 , view Weight: 0.49 , theory Weight: 0.46 , approach Weight: 0.44
Siblings	constructivism Weight: 0.33 , theology Weight: 0.31 , formalism Weight: 0.31 , naturalism Weight: 0.31 , political ideology Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered theory	1.00
is theory	0.95
is best theory	0.90
be considered sociological theory	0.86
be considered micro theory	0.86
be more important than theories	0.85
is hypothesis	0.84
be different from hypothesis	0.84
be more important than modern theories	0.83
be considered micro sociological theory	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(theory, be more important than theories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(theory, is hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(theory, is hypothesis)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than modern theories)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than theories)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(theory, be different from hypothesis)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(theory, is hypothesis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(theory, be more important than theories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(theory, is hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered theory)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(functionalism, is theory)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is best theory)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is theory)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is theory)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(functionalism, is theory)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(functionalism, is best theory)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(functionalism, is best theory)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, is best theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(theory, is hypothesis)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(theory, is hypothesis)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(functionalism, be considered theory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)