gammon: is meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.37
, food
Weight: 0.21
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.30
, lamb
Weight: 0.30
, meat pie
Weight: 0.30
, chicken
Weight: 0.29
, hamburger
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is meat 1.00
is red meat 0.94
be different colour to pork 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chicken, is red meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hamburger, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chicken, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chicken, is meat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chicken, is red meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chicken, is red meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(gammon, is meat)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(gammon, is red meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gammon, be different colour to pork)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(gammon, be different colour to pork)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(gammon, be different colour to pork)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gammon, be different colour to pork)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gammon, is meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(gammon, is meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hamburger, is meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chicken, is meat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gammon, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, is red meat)