gazelle: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prey
Weight: 0.59
, antelope
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, species
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cheetah
Weight: 0.36
, rhino
Weight: 0.35
, zebra
Weight: 0.35
, hare
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
sense danger 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animal, sense danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gazelle, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(animal, sense danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(animal, sense danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rhino, be in danger)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(zebra, be in danger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animal, sense danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gazelle, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(zebra, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(zebra, be in danger)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rhino, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rhino, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(gazelle, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gazelle, sense danger)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(gazelle, sense danger)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(gazelle, sense danger)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, sense danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gazelle, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(animal, sense danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cheetah, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rhino, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(zebra, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(gazelle, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(animal, sense danger)