gender: affect political socialization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents determinant
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sex
Weight: 0.34
, inequality
Weight: 0.33
, factor
Weight: 0.33
, geography
Weight: 0.33
, color
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect political socialization 1.00
is social 0.79
affect education 0.77
affect communication 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(inequality, affect education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect education)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(gender, affect political socialization)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(gender, affect communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(gender, affect communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(gender, affect communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gender, is social)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect education)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(gender, affect education)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect communication)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(gender, affect education)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(gender, affect education)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(gender, is social)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(gender, is social)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(gender, is social)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect political socialization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(gender, affect political socialization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is social)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect political socialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(inequality, affect education)