giant panda: be in danger of extinction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger of extinction 1.00
be vulnerable to extinction 0.91
is extinct 0.80
be endangered from humans 0.80
get extinct 0.79
go extinct 0.79
be endangered 2018 0.78
be endangered 0.78
be endangered ks2 0.78
is endangered 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bear, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, be endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(species, go extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bear, go extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bear, go extinct)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(species, go extinct)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, be endangered)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(bear, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bear, go extinct)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(species, go extinct)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(species, be endangered)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bear, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger of extinction)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger of extinction)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(panda, is extinct)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is extinct)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bear, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, be endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(species, go extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bear, go extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be in danger of extinction)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(red panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(panda bear, go extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(panda bear, go extinct)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be in danger of extinction)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(red panda, go extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(red panda, go extinct)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(giant panda, go extinct)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(giant panda, go extinct)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, go extinct)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(giant panda, get extinct)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(giant panda, get extinct)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bear, go extinct)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, go extinct)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(species, be endangered)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in danger of extinction)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(orangutan, be in danger of extinction)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(panda bear, is extinct)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(panda bear, go extinct)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bear, go extinct)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, go extinct)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(species, be endangered)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is endangered)