golfer: wear hat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.50
, sportsman
Weight: 0.49
, golf club
Weight: 0.49
Siblings tennis player
Weight: 0.36
, football player
Weight: 0.35
, hockey player
Weight: 0.35
, soccer player
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear hat 1.00
wear hats 0.94
wear pants 0.87
wear white pants 0.87
wear gloves 0.86
wear two pants 0.85
have wear 0.85
wear clothes 0.84
wear pink 0.83
wear two shirts 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear gloves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, have wear)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tennis player, have wear)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tennis player, have wear)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(soccer player, have wear)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(soccer player, have wear)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(football player, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(football player, wear gloves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(golfer, wear hat)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear pink)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear gloves)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear pants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(golfer, wear gloves)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(golfer, wear hat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tennis player, have wear)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soccer player, have wear)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(football player, wear gloves)