graphics: be in football games bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graphic
Weight: 0.57
, design
Weight: 0.47
, topic
Weight: 0.44
, department
Weight: 0.39
, tool
Weight: 0.38
Siblings screen
Weight: 0.31
, animation
Weight: 0.31
, interface
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.30
, color
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in football games bad 1.00
be in football games 0.98
be important in games 0.87
be important in video games 0.83
make game better 0.82
be worse for players 0.81
compare games with old computers 0.78
compare games with computers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(graphics, be in football games)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(graphics, be in football games)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(graphics, be in football games)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(graphics, be in football games)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(graphics, be worse for players)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(graphics, be worse for players)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(graphics, make game better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(graphics, be worse for players)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(graphics, compare games with computers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(graphics, make game better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(graphics, compare games with old computers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(graphics, compare games with computers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(graphics, compare games with computers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(graphics, be worse for players)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(graphics, be important in games)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(graphics, make game better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(graphics, compare games with computers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(graphics, be important in video games)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(graphics, make game better)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(graphics, be important in games)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(graphics, be important in video games)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(graphics, be important in games)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(graphics, be important in video games)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(graphics, be important in games)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(graphics, be important in video games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(graphics, be in football games bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)