graphics: compare games with old computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graphic
Weight: 0.57
, design
Weight: 0.47
, topic
Weight: 0.44
, department
Weight: 0.39
, tool
Weight: 0.38
Siblings screen
Weight: 0.31
, animation
Weight: 0.31
, interface
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.30
, color
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare games with old computers 1.00
compare games with computers 0.97
work with old computers 0.89
work with computers 0.84
be important in games 0.78
be important in video games 0.78
be in football games bad 0.78
be in football games 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(graphics, compare games with computers)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(graphics, compare games with computers)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(graphics, compare games with computers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(graphics, work with old computers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(graphics, work with old computers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(graphics, work with computers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(graphics, work with old computers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(graphics, work with computers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(graphics, work with computers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(graphics, be in football games bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(graphics, be in football games bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(graphics, be in football games bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(graphics, be in football games bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(graphics, be in football games)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(graphics, be in football games)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(graphics, be in football games)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(graphics, be in football games)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(graphics, be important in games)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(graphics, be important in video games)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(graphics, work with old computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(graphics, be important in games)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(graphics, be important in games)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(graphics, be important in video games)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(graphics, be important in video games)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(graphics, compare games with computers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(graphics, be important in games)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(graphics, be important in video games)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(graphics, work with computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(graphics, compare games with old computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(graphics, compare games with old computers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(graphics, compare games with old computers)