graphics: have big drivers

Property	Similarity
have big drivers	1.00
have drivers	0.95
have difficult drivers	0.91
have fucking retarded drivers	0.78
have proprietary drivers	0.78

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(graphics, have drivers)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have drivers)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(graphics, have drivers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(graphics, have drivers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have difficult drivers)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(graphics, have difficult drivers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(graphics, have difficult drivers)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(graphics, have difficult drivers)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have proprietary drivers)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(graphics, have proprietary drivers)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(graphics, have proprietary drivers)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(graphics, have big drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(graphics, have proprietary drivers)

Parents	graphic Weight: 0.57 , design Weight: 0.47 , topic Weight: 0.44 , department Weight: 0.39 , tool Weight: 0.38
Siblings	screen Weight: 0.31 , animation Weight: 0.31 , interface Weight: 0.31 , design pattern Weight: 0.30 , color Weight: 0.30

graphics: have big drivers

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible