graphics: have drivers

Property	Similarity
have drivers	1.00
have big drivers	0.95
have difficult drivers	0.92
have proprietary drivers	0.81
have fucking retarded drivers	0.79

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have big drivers)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have difficult drivers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(graphics, have big drivers)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(graphics, have difficult drivers)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(graphics, have big drivers)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(graphics, have difficult drivers)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(graphics, have big drivers)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(graphics, have difficult drivers)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have proprietary drivers)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(graphics, have proprietary drivers)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(graphics, have proprietary drivers)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(graphics, have drivers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(graphics, have proprietary drivers)

Parents	graphic Weight: 0.57 , design Weight: 0.47 , topic Weight: 0.44 , department Weight: 0.39 , tool Weight: 0.38
Siblings	screen Weight: 0.31 , animation Weight: 0.31 , interface Weight: 0.31 , design pattern Weight: 0.30 , color Weight: 0.30

graphics: have drivers

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible