graphics: have fucking retarded drivers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graphic
Weight: 0.57
, design
Weight: 0.47
, topic
Weight: 0.44
, department
Weight: 0.39
, tool
Weight: 0.38
Siblings screen
Weight: 0.31
, animation
Weight: 0.31
, interface
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.30
, color
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have fucking retarded drivers 1.00
have drivers 0.79
have big drivers 0.78
have difficult drivers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have big drivers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have drivers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have difficult drivers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(graphics, have drivers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(graphics, have big drivers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(graphics, have difficult drivers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(graphics, have drivers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(graphics, have drivers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(graphics, have difficult drivers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(graphics, have big drivers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(graphics, have difficult drivers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(graphics, have big drivers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(graphics, have fucking retarded drivers)