grasshopper: has physical part wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, creature
Weight: 0.57
, bird
Weight: 0.57
, crop
Weight: 0.55
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36
, aphid
Weight: 0.36
, ant
Weight: 0.36
, moth
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part wings 1.00
has physical part legs 0.83
has physical part blade 0.78
has physical part antennae 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(grasshopper, has physical part wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(moth, has physical part wings)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ant, has physical part wings)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ant, has physical part antennae)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(moth, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(moth, has physical part wings)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ant, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ant, has physical part wings)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(ant, has physical part antennae)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ant, has physical part antennae)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(grasshopper, has physical part wings)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part legs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part antennae)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part antennae)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(grasshopper, has physical part antennae)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part blade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(grasshopper, has physical part legs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part legs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(grasshopper, has physical part antennae)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(grasshopper, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(grasshopper, has physical part blade)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part blade)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(grasshopper, has physical part blade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(grasshopper, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(moth, has physical part wings)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ant, has physical part wings)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ant, has physical part antennae)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(grasshopper, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)