gravy: be in hot pie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liquid
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, vegetable
Weight: 0.53
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.38
, lasagna
Weight: 0.37
, polenta
Weight: 0.36
, steak
Weight: 0.36
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hot pie 1.00
be in pie 0.96
be in hot pie burn 0.95
be in pie burn 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(gravy, be in hot pie)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gravy, be in pie)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(gravy, be in pie)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(gravy, be in pie burn)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(gravy, be in pie burn)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(gravy, be in pie)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in pie burn)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in pie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(gravy, be in pie burn)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(gravy, be in hot pie)