gravy: be in pie burn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liquid
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, vegetable
Weight: 0.53
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.38
, lasagna
Weight: 0.37
, polenta
Weight: 0.36
, steak
Weight: 0.36
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in pie burn 1.00
be in hot pie burn 0.97
be in pie 0.92
be in hot pie 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(gravy, be in pie burn)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gravy, be in pie)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(gravy, be in pie)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(gravy, be in pie)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(gravy, be in hot pie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in pie)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(gravy, be in hot pie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in pie burn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in pie burn)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(gravy, be in pie burn)