gravy: be in hot pie burn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liquid
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, vegetable
Weight: 0.53
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.38
, lasagna
Weight: 0.37
, polenta
Weight: 0.36
, steak
Weight: 0.36
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hot pie burn 1.00
be in pie burn 0.97
be in hot pie 0.95
be in pie 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(gravy, be in hot pie burn)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(gravy, be in pie burn)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(gravy, be in pie burn)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in pie burn)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gravy, be in pie)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(gravy, be in hot pie)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(gravy, be in pie burn)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(gravy, be in pie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(gravy, be in pie)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(gravy, be in hot pie)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in pie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gravy, be in hot pie burn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(gravy, be in hot pie burn)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(gravy, be in hot pie burn)