great dane: is apartment dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents breed
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, dog
Weight: 0.56
, puppy
Weight: 0.54
, monster
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rottweiler
Weight: 0.45
, good luck
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is apartment dogs 1.00
is good apartment dogs 0.99
is dogs 0.81
is good dogs 0.78
be considered dogs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(great dane, is apartment dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(great dane, is dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(great dane, is dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(great dane, is dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(great dane, is good dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(great dane, is good dogs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(great dane, is good dogs)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is good dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)