great dane: is dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents breed
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, dog
Weight: 0.56
, puppy
Weight: 0.54
, monster
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rottweiler
Weight: 0.45
, good luck
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dogs 1.00
is good dogs 0.95
be considered dogs 0.94
be considered working dogs 0.86
be bigger than dogs 0.84
be bigger than other dogs 0.82
is apartment dogs 0.81
is good apartment dogs 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(great dane, is dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(great dane, is dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(great dane, is dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(great dane, is apartment dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(great dane, is good dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(great dane, is good dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(great dane, is good dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is good dogs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(great dane, is good apartment dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(great dane, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(great dane, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)