great dane: be considered dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents breed
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, dog
Weight: 0.56
, puppy
Weight: 0.54
, monster
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rottweiler
Weight: 0.45
, good luck
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered dogs 1.00
is dogs 0.94
be considered working dogs 0.92
is good dogs 0.91
be bigger than dogs 0.82
be bigger than other dogs 0.81
is good apartment dogs 0.77
is apartment dogs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great dane, be considered dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(great dane, be considered dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(great dane, is dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(great dane, is dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(great dane, is dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(great dane, is good dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is apartment dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(great dane, is apartment dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(great dane, is apartment dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(great dane, is good dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(great dane, is apartment dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(great dane, is good dogs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(great dane, is good apartment dogs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is good dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great dane, be considered dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great dane, be considered dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)