greenland: is low populated

Related concepts

Parents	island Weight: 0.61 , land Weight: 0.59 , place Weight: 0.57 , region Weight: 0.56 , area Weight: 0.54
Siblings	cayman islands Weight: 0.35 , long island Weight: 0.34 , rhode island Weight: 0.34 , solomon islands Weight: 0.34 , staten island Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is low populated	1.00
is populated	0.93
is less populated	0.90
is sparsely populated	0.84
have low population	0.80
is inhabited	0.79
have low population density	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(place, have low population density) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(greenland, is low populated)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(region, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(greenland, is low populated)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(region, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(greenland, is low populated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(region, is populated)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(region, is sparsely populated)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(place, have low population density)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(place, have low population density)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(region, is sparsely populated)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(place, have low population density) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(greenland, is low populated)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(region, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(greenland, is low populated)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(region, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(greenland, is low populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(greenland, is low populated)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(greenland, is populated)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(greenland, is populated)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(greenland, is populated)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(greenland, is less populated)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(greenland, is less populated)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(greenland, is less populated)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(greenland, is sparsely populated)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(greenland, is sparsely populated)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(greenland, is sparsely populated)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is less populated)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(greenland, have low population density)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is sparsely populated)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(greenland, have low population)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(greenland, have low population)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(greenland, have low population density)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(greenland, have low population density)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(greenland, have low population)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(greenland, have low population density)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is populated)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(greenland, have low population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is low populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(greenland, is low populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(region, is populated)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(place, have low population density)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(region, is populated)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(greenland, is low populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(place, have low population density)