guard: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security guard
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, position
Weight: 0.61
, servant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rip
Weight: 0.51
, across
Weight: 0.42
, west berlin
Weight: 0.36
, cornerback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
is left paid 0.91
pay tax 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(guard, is paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(security guard, get paid)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(guard, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(servant, pay tax)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(guard, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(security guard, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(servant, pay tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(servant, pay tax)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(guard, is paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(security guard, get paid)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(guard, is paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(servant, pay tax)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(guard, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(guard, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(guard, is left paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(guard, get paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(guard, get paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(guard, is left paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(guard, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(guard, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(guard, is left paid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(guard, is left paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guard, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(guard, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(servant, pay tax)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(servant, pay tax)