habitat: be important to great lakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to great lakes 1.00
be important to lakes 0.96
affect water quality in area 0.75
be important to things 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to things)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(freshwater, be important to things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be important to things)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to great lakes)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to lakes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to lakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to great lakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to great lakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to things)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to great lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area)