habitat: be important to lakes

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , activity Weight: 0.56 , structure Weight: 0.55 , charity Weight: 0.55
Siblings	grassland Weight: 0.73 , wetland Weight: 0.71 , pond Weight: 0.65 , freshwater Weight: 0.65 , marsh Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to lakes	1.00
be important to great lakes	0.96
protect shorelines from erosion	0.77
is water	0.77
is fish	0.76
affect waterfalls	0.76
effect river	0.76
be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands	0.76
affect water quality in area	0.76
affect groundwater	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(activity, effect river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(habitat, be important to lakes)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(activity, affect groundwater) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(habitat, be important to lakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(activity, affect groundwater)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(activity, effect river)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(activity, effect river)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(activity, affect groundwater)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(pond, is fish)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect shorelines from erosion)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(pond, is water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(activity, effect river) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(activity, affect groundwater) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(pond, is water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(pond, is water)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(wetland, protect shorelines from erosion) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(wetland, protect shorelines from erosion)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(pond, is fish) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(pond, is fish)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(habitat, be important to lakes)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to great lakes)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(habitat, be important to great lakes)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(habitat, be important to great lakes)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to great lakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(habitat, be important to lakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(activity, affect groundwater)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(activity, effect river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(pond, is water)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(wetland, protect shorelines from erosion)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(pond, is fish)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(activity, affect groundwater)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(habitat, be important to lakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(activity, effect river)