habitat: is are destroyed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are destroyed 1.00
is is destroyed 0.96
is destroyed 0.94
get destroyed 0.93
become destroyed 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are destroyed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is are destroyed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, get destroyed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(wetland, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(wetland, is are destroyed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(grassland, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grassland, is are destroyed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wetland, get destroyed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wetland, get destroyed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(habitat, is are destroyed)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(habitat, is is destroyed)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is is destroyed)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(habitat, is is destroyed)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(habitat, is destroyed)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(habitat, is destroyed)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is destroyed)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(habitat, get destroyed)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(habitat, get destroyed)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(habitat, get destroyed)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(habitat, become destroyed)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(habitat, become destroyed)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, become destroyed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(habitat, is is destroyed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(habitat, become destroyed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(habitat, is destroyed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(habitat, get destroyed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(wetland, is are destroyed)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grassland, is are destroyed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wetland, get destroyed)