hacker: hack companies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hack companies 1.00
hack in to company computers 0.89
hack instagram 0.89
hack 0.89
hack in to big company computers 0.88
hack websites 0.86
hack instagram accounts 0.86
hack computer 0.86
hack computers 0.85
hack games 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hacker, hack companies)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hacker, hack)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(hacker, hack websites)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack instagram)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack instagram accounts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack websites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack games)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hacker, hack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack websites)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hacker, hack games)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hacker, hack websites)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hacker, hack instagram)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack games)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hacker, hack instagram accounts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack games)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack instagram)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack instagram accounts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hacker, hack instagram)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hacker, hack instagram accounts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack companies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hacker, hack companies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(hacker, hack companies)