hacker: hack computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hack computers 1.00
hack into computers 0.98
hack computer 0.97
hack in to company computers 0.96
hack in to big company computers 0.95
hack instagram 0.92
hack 0.92
hack phones 0.91
hack stuff 0.88
hack instagram accounts 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computers)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack into computers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack phones)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack instagram)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hacker, hack)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack instagram accounts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hacker, hack into computers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hacker, hack)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(hacker, hack phones)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack into computers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hacker, hack instagram)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hacker, hack instagram accounts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hacker, hack into computers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack phones)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack instagram)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack instagram accounts)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hacker, hack instagram)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hacker, hack instagram accounts)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hacker, hack phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hacker, hack computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computers)