hardware: be more important than software

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchandise
Weight: 0.64
, operating system
Weight: 0.64
, engineering
Weight: 0.61
, module
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
Siblings software
Weight: 0.35
, electronics
Weight: 0.34
, unix
Weight: 0.33
, solaris
Weight: 0.33
, macintosh
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than software 1.00
be faster than software 0.92
be more important than hardware 0.90
feel easier than software 1 0.90
is software 0.89
make software work 0.88
be more expensive than hardware 0.87
be called software 0.87
needs software work 0.85
run software 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(operating system, is software)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hardware, be more important than software)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(operating system, is software)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is software)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(software, be called software)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(operating system, is software)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(software, be more important than hardware)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(software, be more important than hardware)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(software, be called software)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(software, be called software)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(software, be more expensive than hardware)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(software, be more expensive than hardware)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hardware, be more important than software)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hardware, make software work)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be faster than software)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hardware, make software work)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hardware, run software)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hardware, make software work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hardware, needs software work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(hardware, make software work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hardware, run software)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hardware, run software)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hardware, run software)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(hardware, needs software work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hardware, be faster than software)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hardware, be faster than software)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hardware, be faster than software)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hardware, be more important than software)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(operating system, is software)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(software, be called software)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(software, be more important than hardware)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(software, be more expensive than hardware)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(operating system, is software)