hardware: understand software

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchandise
Weight: 0.64
, operating system
Weight: 0.64
, engineering
Weight: 0.61
, module
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
Siblings software
Weight: 0.35
, electronics
Weight: 0.34
, unix
Weight: 0.33
, solaris
Weight: 0.33
, macintosh
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
understand software 1.00
is software 0.89
make software work 0.88
read software 0.88
be called software 0.87
interact with software 0.85
run software 0.84
be more important than software 0.84
needs software work 0.83
understand coding languages 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(operating system, is software)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hardware, understand software)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(operating system, is software)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is software)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(software, be called software)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(operating system, is software)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hardware, understand software)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(software, be called software)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(software, be called software)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hardware, understand software)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hardware, make software work)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hardware, read software)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hardware, interact with software)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hardware, make software work)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hardware, read software)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hardware, interact with software)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hardware, run software)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hardware, read software)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hardware, run software)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hardware, make software work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hardware, interact with software)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hardware, needs software work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hardware, read software)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hardware, run software)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(hardware, make software work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hardware, run software)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(hardware, interact with software)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(hardware, needs software work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hardware, be more important than software)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hardware, understand software)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hardware, understand software)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(operating system, is software)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(software, be called software)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hardware, understand software)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(operating system, is software)