health insurance: be more expensive in rural areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insurance
Weight: 0.73
, coverage
Weight: 0.71
, protection
Weight: 0.71
, retirement
Weight: 0.70
, service
Weight: 0.68
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive in rural areas 1.00
be more expensive in areas 0.92
be more expensive in states 0.82
be on more expensive 0.78
be cheaper in poor countries 0.78
is more expensive 0.78
be in area 0.78
get more expensive 0.77
be more expensive for less 0.77
be more expensive for females 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be cheaper in poor countries)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(coverage, be in area)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in area)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(service, be cheaper in poor countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(service, be cheaper in poor countries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be cheaper in poor countries)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(coverage, be in area)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in states)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in states)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(health insurance, be more expensive in states)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(health insurance, be more expensive for females)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in states)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, get more expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(health insurance, get more expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(health insurance, get more expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(health insurance, get more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(coverage, be in area)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be cheaper in poor countries)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(coverage, be in area)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be cheaper in poor countries)