heavy metal: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.72
, chemical compound
Weight: 0.69
, metal
Weight: 0.68
Siblings aluminum
Weight: 0.72
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.72
, copper
Weight: 0.71
, gold
Weight: 0.70
, copper sulfate
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
have reputation 0.97
has quality bad 0.81
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(heavy metal, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(metal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(copper, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gold, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(gold, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(copper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(copper, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(heavy metal, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heavy metal, have reputation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, have reputation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(heavy metal, have reputation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(heavy metal, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(gold, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(copper, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(heavy metal, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)