helping: be considered trait

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.37
, day
Weight: 0.29
, problem
Weight: 0.28
, help
Weight: 0.28
, everyone
Weight: 0.21
Siblings charity
Weight: 0.26
, homeless shelter
Weight: 0.26
, task force
Weight: 0.26
, family member
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered trait 1.00
has trait fun 0.87
be considered trait of professionals 0.85
trait of professionals 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(helping, be considered trait)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(helping, has trait fun)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(helping, trait of professionals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(helping, has trait fun)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(helping, trait of professionals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(helping, trait of professionals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(helping, trait of professionals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(helping, has trait fun)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(helping, has trait fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(helping, be considered trait)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(helping, be considered trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(helping, be considered trait)