helping: trait of professionals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.37
, day
Weight: 0.29
, problem
Weight: 0.28
, help
Weight: 0.28
, everyone
Weight: 0.21
Siblings charity
Weight: 0.26
, homeless shelter
Weight: 0.26
, task force
Weight: 0.26
, family member
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
trait of professionals 1.00
be considered trait of professionals 0.98
be considered trait 0.78
has trait fun 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(helping, trait of professionals)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(helping, be considered trait)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(helping, has trait fun)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(helping, be considered trait)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(helping, be considered trait)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(helping, be considered trait)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(helping, has trait fun)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(helping, has trait fun)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(helping, has trait fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(helping, trait of professionals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(helping, trait of professionals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(helping, trait of professionals)