his: be current state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be current state 1.00
has state potential 0.78
has state health 0.75
has state development 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(his, be current state)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(his, has state potential)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(his, has state health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(his, has state development)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(his, has state potential)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(his, has state health)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(his, has state development)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(his, has state potential)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(his, has state development)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(his, has state health)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(his, has state development)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(his, has state potential)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(his, has state health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(his, be current state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, be current state)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(his, be current state)