his: has state development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state development 1.00
has state potential 0.78
has state health 0.78
be current state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(his, has state development)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(his, has state potential)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(his, has state health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(his, be current state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(his, has state health)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(his, has state potential)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(his, has state health)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(his, has state potential)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(his, be current state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(his, be current state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(his, be current state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(his, has state health)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(his, has state potential)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(his, has state development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(his, has state development)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(his, has state development)