history: be related to psychology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.65
, moment
Weight: 0.64
, region
Weight: 0.64
Siblings roman empire
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.33
, nature
Weight: 0.32
, facet
Weight: 0.32
, thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to psychology 1.00
be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology science 0.91
be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science 0.90
be related to economics 0.83
be related to social science 0.83
be related to science 0.82
is social science 0.78
be considered social science 0.77
be related to other social disciplines 0.77
be related to social disciplines 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nature, be related to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(nature, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nature, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(history, be related to psychology)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(history, be related to economics)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(history, be related to social science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(history, be considered social science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(history, is social science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(history, be related to social science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(history, be related to other social disciplines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(history, be related to social science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(history, be related to economics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(history, be related to economics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(history, be considered social science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(history, be considered social science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to economics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(history, is social science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(history, be related to other social disciplines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(history, is social science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(history, be related to other social disciplines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(history, is social science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered social science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to other social disciplines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to psychology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(history, be related to psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(nature, be related to science)