hockey: is best sport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best sport 1.00
is good sport 0.95
is great sport 0.93
is sport 0.93
be sport 0.92
is bad sport 0.92
be good sport play 0.91
is popular sport 0.91
be greatest sport of time 0.90
is worst sport 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is best sport)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ice hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is best sport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ice hockey, is sport)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hockey, is best sport)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hockey, is good sport)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hockey, is sport)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, is good sport)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hockey, is sport)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hockey, be sport)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(hockey, is great sport)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey, be sport)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hockey, is sport)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hockey, is bad sport)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(hockey, be sport)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(hockey, is good sport)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hockey, be good sport play)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hockey, is popular sport)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hockey, is great sport)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hockey, is bad sport)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hockey, is popular sport)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hockey, be good sport play)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hockey, is great sport)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hockey, is bad sport)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hockey, is popular sport)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hockey, be good sport play)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is great sport)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is good sport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport play)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is popular sport)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is sport)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be sport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hockey, is best sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is sport)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is best sport)