hockey: is great sport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great sport 1.00
is good sport 0.96
is best sport 0.93
be good sport play 0.92
is sport 0.92
is bad sport 0.92
be sport 0.91
be greatest sport of time 0.90
be good sport involved 0.90
be good sport involved in 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is best sport)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ice hockey, is sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is sport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ice hockey, is best sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is best sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(hockey, is great sport)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hockey, is good sport)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hockey, is sport)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, is good sport)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hockey, be sport)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hockey, is best sport)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hockey, is sport)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hockey, be good sport play)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey, be sport)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hockey, is bad sport)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(hockey, is good sport)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hockey, is sport)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(hockey, be sport)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hockey, is best sport)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hockey, be good sport play)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hockey, is bad sport)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hockey, be good sport play)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hockey, is bad sport)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is good sport)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport play)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is sport)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be sport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is great sport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hockey, is great sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is sport)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is great sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is best sport)