hold: have sound quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.51
, condition
Weight: 0.50
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.33
, stand
Weight: 0.32
, lock
Weight: 0.31
, hinge
Weight: 0.31
, roll
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sound quality 1.00
has sound sound 0.93
have poor sound quality 0.93
sound bad 0.89
have quality 0.87
is sound ever 0.86
is quality 0.84
sound terrible 0.83
is bad quality 0.81
sound terribly bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hold, have sound quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hold, have sound quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(hold, have sound quality)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hold, has sound sound)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hold, sound bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hold, is sound ever)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hold, is quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hold, sound terribly bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hold, is bad quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hold, sound bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hold, has sound sound)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hold, have quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hold, has sound sound)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(hold, has sound sound)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(hold, have quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hold, have quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hold, sound terrible)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hold, sound terribly bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(hold, sound bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hold, is quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hold, is bad quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hold, is sound ever)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hold, is quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hold, sound terribly bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hold, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hold, is bad quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hold, sound bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hold, is sound ever)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hold, sound terrible)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hold, is sound ever)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hold, is bad quality)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hold, sound terribly bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hold, have sound quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hold, have sound quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)