hold: is crappy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.51
, condition
Weight: 0.50
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.33
, stand
Weight: 0.32
, lock
Weight: 0.31
, hinge
Weight: 0.31
, roll
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is crappy 1.00
is bad quality 0.77
is terrible quality 0.77
sound terrible 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(hold, is crappy)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hold, is bad quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hold, is terrible quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hold, sound terrible)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hold, is bad quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hold, is terrible quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hold, sound terrible)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hold, is bad quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(hold, is terrible quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hold, is bad quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hold, is crappy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hold, is crappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hold, is crappy)