hold: is terrible quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.51
, condition
Weight: 0.50
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.33
, stand
Weight: 0.32
, lock
Weight: 0.31
, hinge
Weight: 0.31
, roll
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is terrible quality 1.00
be terrible in 2016 0.94
is bad quality 0.91
has quality bad 0.89
sound terrible 0.89
is poor quality 0.84
have poor quality 0.84
have poor sound quality 0.82
is quality 0.80
have quality 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hold, is terrible quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lock, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(stand, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hold, is terrible quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(stand, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(stand, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lock, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lock, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(hold, is terrible quality)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hold, be terrible in 2016)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hold, be terrible in 2016)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hold, be terrible in 2016)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hold, sound terrible)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hold, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hold, be terrible in 2016)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hold, is bad quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hold, is bad quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hold, have quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hold, is bad quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hold, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hold, have poor quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hold, is bad quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hold, is poor quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hold, sound terrible)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hold, have quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hold, have poor quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(hold, have quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hold, is poor quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hold, have poor quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hold, is quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hold, is quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hold, is quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hold, have poor quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hold, is poor quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hold, is poor quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hold, is quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hold, is terrible quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(stand, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(lock, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hold, is terrible quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)